Am I Finally Getting the Message?
Am I beginning at last accurately to penetrate the cryptic philosophy of C. J. Jung?
Jung reminds us in his Red Book that between crucifixion and resurrection, Jesus descended into Hell for three days. The Bible is quite clear about this, though the sojourn seems to have been swept under the rug in most traditions.
But why this interlude in the depths? Jung explains it in rather Taoist terms. There can be no Light without Darkness. If He hadn't descended into Hell, He could not have risen into Heaven. Likewise, Jung himself never would have become an integrated, "individuated" man but for a long journey, recounted in the Red Book, into a hell that I cannot call "private" because it resides in the collective unconscious.
How does this tie to my own experience?
The narrative contents of my dream are trivial, stupid even. I am a lawyer. I have been tasked with arranging to have a broken washing machine fixed, one that services a hospital where two of my friends, also clients, are confined. I go down into the basement of the hospital and crawl inside of the tub of the machine, which is very large. From within I can move the contraption, but only a little bit before it seems to hit an obstacle. It becomes clear to me that no one in a position to help me get it fixed will ever raise a finger. It is permanently broken and will not be replaced. I have failed in my task.
Worse, when my boss and mentor, who is named David, interrogates me about the job, I tell him that I am making good progress and that all will soon be well. From the first words out of my mouth, David can see that I am lying, and he holds me in contempt for it.
When I awaken from the dream, it seems to me on a visceral level that it has captured my dilemma and also my contemptible spirit.
What I don't understand, to now, is how individuation is supposed to give rise to contentment, and in particular how it arms one against the terror of death, if indeed it does so.
By contrast, consider the work of another sage who has just come to my attention via the podcast world -- Prof. John Vervaeke of the University of Toronto. His field of study is cognition and consciousness. He argues at length, based very much on a Buddhist perspective, that none of us should wish to be immortal, that immortality would soon become a hell of its own, as we run out of goals and our true journey of exploration grinds to a halt. In his mid-sixties, he says emphatically that he does not wish to live more than an additional 20 years. "So the blackness of Death does not terrify you?" asks his interlocutor. "There is no blackness" he replies. "You need an experiencer for there to be blackness. The experiencer has been annihilated."